Raleigh

Subject: Raleigh Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:01 pm

Will have to appear before the RFL over his tackle on Orford.

From what I saw both live and on T.V. afterward I really can't understand why he would have a case to answer. Hopefully nothing will come from this.

Subject: Re: Raleigh Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:48 pm

Andy, as we all know isn't a malicious player. He'll be fine.

Subject: Re: Raleigh Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:58 pm

Typical RFL.
Our man gets put before the beak for "attacking the legs" whereas a Bulls player who hits the head of an opponent gets a warning.

You couldn't make it up.

Subject: Re: Raleigh Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:02 pm

JudgeB wrote:: Typical RFL.
Our man gets put before the beak for "attacking the legs" whereas a Bulls player who hits the head of an opponent gets a warning.

You couldn't make it up.

Nope, you couldn't JB.
Look at it though, Cummings fields a game from time to time and completely makes a balls of the job. What an example he sets.
The rest of the idiots at Redhall, or wherever they are now are probbo taking a large wedge of cash every month for making a bl**dy mockery of our game as well! Mad

Subject: Re: Raleigh Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:00 pm

I dont know why they do the job with you lot on their backs!!

I apppreciate the fact that given a comic relief nose and baggy trousers theyd get a job with Barnum and Bailey any day!! Embarassed

mind you -dyer see that old giffer by the ad boards giving him some earache second half "!!

mind you - dont think his hearings top notch - couldnt have heard him even with his hearing aid in !!!

Subject: Re: Raleigh Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:22 pm

Raleigh is cleared to play Hull due to his previous good behaviour.

clicky click click

That is good news because I think our weakest area for cover is prop and now we are missing Mason we really can't afford too many more missing in that position.

Subject: Re: Raleigh Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:46 pm

No fine either..good news!

Subject: Re: Raleigh Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:30 pm

Eclair wrote:: No fine either..good news!

So basically not guilty then Eclair?

Subject: Re: Raleigh Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:24 pm

Sadly they decided to record a guilty verdict, but as it was deemed to be more clumsy than malicious, and with his previous exemplary record, no further action other than a warning.....he's used up his 'get out of jail' card!

Subject: Re: Raleigh Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:41 pm

Eclair wrote:: Sadly they decided to record a guilty verdict, but as it was deemed to be more clumsy than malicious, and with his previous exemplary record, no further action other than a warning.....he's used up his 'get out of jail' card!

Aren't they a complete bunch of plonkers? The RFL is made up mostly of people with no playing or official experience whatsoever, but they have the right to judge on (and mostly get them wrong) infringments.

» raleigh out
» Raleigh
» Andy Raleigh
» Mr & Mrs Andy Raleigh
» Andy Raleigh